Entry tags:
stupid lj!
Sorry
emony - LJ seems to have gone a bit wrong and I've littered your journal with blank comments and my shagging unicorns icon! Why is it that when I actually want to come on LJ and comment (and I've got about six tabs open with different posts that I want to comment on) I can't because LJ is broken?
What I was trying to say was: I would also like some Life on Mars icons but I don't know where to get them from. Anyone on my flist know of a good place?
And then I was trying to say to
niannah (also in
emony's journal): I could burn you some Doctor Who DVDs in exchange for Smallville and everything else you've ever sent me (Supernatural - I'm thinking of you!). What do you reckon? Do you want the 'first' series (or the 89987987th series depending on who you talk to) with Christopher Ecclestone? Or the last David Tennant one? Let me know!
I was also going to comment on
grammar_glamour's post about Torchwood. I really do want to know what two men can do in an office with a stopwatch! My mum watched that episode before I did and said something before I saw it about there being innuendo - just shows that it really, really isn't subtext in that show!
What I was trying to say was: I would also like some Life on Mars icons but I don't know where to get them from. Anyone on my flist know of a good place?
And then I was trying to say to
I was also going to comment on

no subject
no subject
About Torchwood. Not subtext AT ALL. It's pretty forward, that show. :p
no subject
no subject
no subject
Yes, forward is one word! I guess when in canon Jack quite clearly will sleep with anyone regardless of gender - looking for slashy subtext is a little pointless!
no subject
no subject
Thank you! And also, thank you re the essay. Very relieved that the argument worked! And I'll fix that typo. Ooops!
no subject
and tell me if y'all figure out the stopwatch thing. because... yeah.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject